Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 27, 1969No. 419PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

This case represents the aftermath of our decision in Simpson v. Union Oil Co., 377 U. S. 13, where we held that a “consignment” agreement for the sale of gasoline, required by Union Oil of lessees of its retail outlets, violated the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. The case was remanded for a hearing on other issues and for a determination of damages. The last sentence of the Court’s opinion stated:

“We reserve the question whether, when all the facts are known, there may be any equities that would warrant only prospective application in damage suits of the rule governing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re E.R. Fegert, Inc., Debtor. Dan O'rourke, Trustee v. Seaboard Surety Company Coral Construction Company, Inc. Shotwell Paving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Resorts International, Inc. v. Fred LowenschussCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Leslie D. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API