Legal Opinion

Breedlove v. Bundy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1884No. 10,745PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

The error complained of in this court is that the court in general term erred in affirming the judgment of the special term.

The errors assigned in the general term were:

1st. Overruling the separate demurrer of appellant Breed-love to the complaint.

2d. Overruling the separate demurrer of appellant McClellan to the complaint.

3d. Overruling the motion of Breedlove and McClellan for a new trial.

The sufficiency of the complaint is first presented, which reads substantially as follows: That appellants, Breedlove and McClellan, together with their co-defendants, Gossett and Gause, on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boaz v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Hardenbrook v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Foltz, Van Camp Hdw., Etc. v. City of Indpls.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. LoomisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Baker v. State Bank of AkronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Grecco v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API