Legal Opinion

Doula v. United Technologies Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1991No. Civ. 4-90-685PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss on the following grounds:

1. Lack of personal jurisdiction;

2. Improper venue; and

3. Insufficient service of process.

In the alternative, defendant moves to transfer venue to the District of Connecticut pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Also before the court is plaintiffs’ renewed motion to continue the March 1, 1991, hearing so that plaintiffs may conduct discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction of the defendant in Minnesota.

BACKGROUND

This dispute arises out of an accident occurring when a Cameroon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zumbro, Inc. v. California Natural ProductsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API