Legal Opinion

Antonio Quesada v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 18, 2009No. 04-07-00615-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

Antonio Marcelo Quesada appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of marijuana, arguing that the trial court erred in submitting the jury charge on punishment. We reverse and remand for a new trial on punishment.

BACKGROUND

A jury found Quesada guilty of misdemeanor possession of marijuana, four ounces or less but more than two ounces. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121(a), (b)(2) (Vernon 2003). Such an offense is á Class A misdemeanor punishable by: “(1) a fíne not to exceed $4,000; (2) confinement in jail for a term not to exceed one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Coody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Coody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anthony MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
  2. Frank Edward Byrd, III v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  3. Timothy Parmer v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API