Legal Opinion
Conn v. C.R. Bard, Inc
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 13, 2021No. 4:14-cv-00298Unknown
1Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eee | □□ FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHARLES CONN, et al, § Plaintiffs, VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-298 C.R. BARD, INC, ef al, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (hereinafter “Bard”) (Doc. No. 66). The Plaintiff Charles Conn (“Conn”) responded (Doc. No. 95), and Bard replied thereto (Doc. No. 109). After this Court made several summary-judgment rulings (see Docs. No. 185 & 304), Conn and Bard…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.