Legal Opinion
Angelica R. Untalan v. Warren A. Stanley
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-07599Unknown
1Opinion
O 11 22 33 44 55 66 United States District Court 77 Central District of California 88 99 ANGELICA R. UNTALAN, Case No. 2:19-cv-07599-ODW-(JEMx) 1100 Plaintiff, 1111 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 1122 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ WARREN A. STANLEY, et al., MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 1133 THE PLEADINGS [45] Defendants. 1144 1155 I. INTRODUCTION 1166 Before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (the “Motion”) by 1177 Defendants Warren A. Stanley, Joseph Farrow, Tariq D. Johnson, Jonathan Cochran, 1188 Joseph Zagorski, Justin Vaughan, and Paola Trinidad (collectively “Defendants). 1199…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.