Legal Opinion

Sokol Bros. Furniture Co. v. Gate

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1922No. 6 Div. 637PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Cora Gate sues Harry Sokol and Nathan Sokol, partners under the firm name of Sokol Bros. Furniture Company, for damages for causing her to he illegally imprisoned. Originally the complaint contained many counts both for false imprisonment and for malicious prosecution. The case was finally submitted to the jury on the fifth count, which was based on illegal imprisonment. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, judgment was rendered thereon bj' the eourt, apd the defendants appeal.

Demurrers were overruled to count 5. It does not aver how long plaintiff was illegally imprisoned. It…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Rich v. McInernySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Parisian Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Gulsby v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farish v. SmootSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Boyette v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Buttrey v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Nolin v. Town of SpringvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API