Legal Opinion

Village of Thiensville v. Olsen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 25, 1998No. 98-2055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Section 805.17(3), Stats., states in pertinent part: "Upon its own motion ... the court may amend, its findings or conclusions or make additional findings or conclusions and may amend the judgment accordingly." Jon R. Olsen, the defendant in this oper ating while intoxicated case, maintains that before the trial court can exercise its authority to reconsider on its own, either the parties or the court must have previously considered the legal issue upon which the court now wishes to comment. We have two responses. First, there are no prerequisites established by the statute except perhaps…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Matter of Estate of O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Salveson v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  3. State v. BrockettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API