State v. Martin
Oregon Supreme Court
The defendant, Edward Hugh Martin, was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, and from the judgment and sentence following, he appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
[100 Pac. 1106.]
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The errors relied upon in the brief of defendant’s counsel, to secure the reversal of a judgment of conviction in a criminal action, relate to the admission of evidence; but as the transcript contains no bill of exceptions, and none appears to have been settled or allowed by the trial court, the alleged errors are unavailing. State v. Kline, 50 Or. 426 (93 Pac. 237.)
*4052. The defendant’s counsel now requests permission to challenge the sufficiency of the indictment, which, it is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Fisher v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Miles v. SwansonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.