Legal Opinion
Mateo Morales v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2002No. 01-2605PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
A jury found Mateo Morales guilty of conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and the district court sentenced him to 360 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. We affirmed. See United States v. Anderson, 236 F.3d 427 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 356, 151 L.Ed.2d 270 (2001).
Morales then filed in the district court a pro se “Petition for Right of Review Pursuant to Title 5, United States Code, Section 702,” arguing that the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, Pub.L. No. 91-513, 84 Stat. 1242…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Quentin Miller, A/K/A "Q" Quentin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Eric Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Frido SeesingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Shawn Richard Anderson, United States of America v. Mateo MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Shahborn EmmanuelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- John T. Martin v. Edward PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Paula Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Micaiah Rey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.