United States v. Shawn Richard Anderson, United States of America v. Mateo Morales
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
A jury convicted Shawn Richard Anderson and Mateo Morales (“appellants”) of conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine. The district court 2 sentenced both appellants to 360 months imprisonment and five years supervised release under 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). While most of the issues appellants raise before this court lack any merit, we do find it necessary to revisit briefly the application to drug sentencing cases of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).
In Apprendi, the Court held that any fact, other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Fabian Aguayo-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America v. Forestell Norman SheppardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alex VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Wade Allen WheatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Fortino E. Diaz, United States of America v. Robert R. LohrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Billie Jerome AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.