Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Aldrich v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1985No. 83-AB-1580; CA A29512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Concurrence

BUTTLER, P. J.,

specially concurring.

For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 93, 694 P2d 1025 (1985), I would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation. Barrier v. Employment Division, 29 Or App 387, 563 P2d 1230 (1977). Accordingly, I would remand this case for a determination limited to which petitioners, if any, joined the strike.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrier v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Cropley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cropley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Members of Boilermakers Local 72 v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Cropley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Cropley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985