Legal Opinion

Cropley v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1985No. EAB-83-AB-1580; CA A29588PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*95VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Four claimants seek judicial review of an Employment Appeals Board order that held that they are not entitled to receive unemployment benefits because they were unemployed “due to a labor dispute.” ORS 657.200(1); OAR 471-30-097.1 We review to determine whether EAB’s order is supported by substantial evidence. ORS 657.282; 183.482(7) and (8)(c). It is not. Therefore, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Claimants are members of Boilermakers Local 72. Northwest Marine Iron Works laid them off because of a lack of work. They expected to return to work as conditions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skookum Co., Inc. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Skookum Co., Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Barrier v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Scoggins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Aldrich v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Aldrich v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Members of Boilermakers Local 72 v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Cropley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API