Legal Opinion

United States v. Nava-Perez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 12, 2001No. 99-51197PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

The sole issue on appeal is whether Felipe Nava-Perez, an alien, is subject to the imposed enhanced penalty, under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), for removal “subsequent to a conviction for commission of an aggravated felony”, based upon the following: after having been deported (equivalent to being removed), he reentered the United States illegally; was convicted for an aggravated felony; was removed pursuant to the summary removal procedure set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5) (“prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date”); reentered the United…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. Jimmy Lee Rasco Marcus A. MiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Fidel Luna-MadellagaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Melesio Carrillo-Lopez, Aka, Jose Lopez-ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Lopez-Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
  4. Opal Labs Inc. v. Sprinklr, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  5. United States v. Canales-SiguenzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API