Legal Opinion

Opal Labs Inc. v. Sprinklr, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 2, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01192Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON OPAL LABS, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-01192-HZ v. OPINION & ORDER SPRINKLR, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Adam M. Starr Chad M. Colton Stanton R. Gallegos Daniel DiCicco Markowitz Herbold, P.C. 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3000 Portland, OR 97204 Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Lane Carey Christopher J. Pallanch Sadie Concepcion Michael C. Willes Tonkon Torp, LLP 1600 Pioneer Tower 888 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 Attorneys for Defendant HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff brings this…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Kass v. KassNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API