Legal Opinion

State v. Hido

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2011No. 10CA0046PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Hido,

2011-Ohio-2560.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF CLARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 10CA0046 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 09TRC10960 09CRB04379 STACY HIDO : Defendant-Appellant : . . . . . . . . . O P I N I O N Rendered on the 27th day of May, 2011. . . . . . . . . . Michael F. Sheils, Chief City Prosecutor, Atty. Reg. No.0021678, 50 East Columbia Street, Springfield, OH 45502 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee Charles M. Rowland, II, Atty. Reg. No.0065603, 2190 Gateway Drive, Fairborn, OH 45324 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant . . . . . . . . . GRADY,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BoczarOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API