Legal Opinion

Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 14, 2014No. 11 C 4574; No. 11 C 6235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:

Under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, the initial authorized sale of a *865patented item terminates the patent holder’s rights to that item, and the patent holder may not sue a downstream user of the item for infringement. Patent exhaustion also applies to method patents. If the holder of a method patent authorizes another to practice the patented method, the patent holder cannot successfully sue for infringement those who acquire from the authorized user a product that substantially embodies the patented method.

In these cases,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Rude v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perfect Co. v. Adaptics Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  2. Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. National Products Inc v. Innovative Intelligent Products LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API