Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:
Under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, the initial authorized sale of a *865patented item terminates the patent holder’s rights to that item, and the patent holder may not sue a downstream user of the item for infringement. Patent exhaustion also applies to method patents. If the holder of a method patent authorizes another to practice the patented method, the patent holder cannot successfully sue for infringement those who acquire from the authorized user a product that substantially embodies the patented method.
In these cases,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Rude v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perfect Co. v. Adaptics Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- National Products Inc v. Innovative Intelligent Products LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022