Legal Opinion
U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 22, 1976No. 8668PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, Justice.
Plaintiff in this suit for breach of contract sought jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant under the long-arm statute. The nonresident defendant made his special appearance to challenge jurisdiction. The trial court, after a hearing, sustained the challenge. The plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The plaintiff is a Texas advertising corporation which went into Oklahoma in order to solicit business from defendant. Defendant and an agent for the plaintiff executed a contract in Oklahoma calling for plaintiff to erect five roadside advertising signs in Oklahoma for defendant.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- O'Brien v. Lanpar CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Atwood Hatcheries v. Heisdorf & Nelson FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. BurtTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Pettit v. American National Bank of AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Diversified Resources Cor. v. Geodynamics Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- P.V.F., Inc. v. Pro Metals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- P.V.F., Inc. v. Pro Metals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001