P.V.F., Inc. v. Pro Metals, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1DissentKem Thompson Frost, Justice
I respectfully dissent. Given the facts in this record and Texas Supreme Court precedent, the due process pendulum should swing in the other direction. This court should sustain P.V.F., Inc.’s challenge to the trial court’s denial of its special appearance, and this court should remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Courts have long rejected the notion that any link to the forum state in a business transaction is sufficient to subject nonresident participants to the jurisdiction of that forum’s courts. See, e.g., Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. SpademanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.