Legal Opinion

Honhorst v. University of North Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 28, 1998No. 2-98-087-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID L. RICHARDS, Justice.

Introduction

Appellant Van Honhorst appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of appellees, the University of North Texas (the University) and Imogene Walden (Walden) on his wrongful termination suit. In two points, appellant contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because sovereign immunity does not bar appellant’s anti-discrimination suit under Texas Labor Code Section 451. Because we hold the legislature did not waive sovereign immunity under the statute by clear and unambiguous language, we affirm.

Summary of Relevant Facts and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kerrville State Hospital v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Battin v. Samaniego, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  3. Denton County v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Kerrville State Hospital v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kerrville State Hospital v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API