Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF L. Dante DiTRAPANO

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2014No. 12-0677Published

1DissentJustice Ketchum

Sometimes we need to mix a little mercy with justice. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Brown, 223 W.Va. 554, 678 S.E.2d 60 (2009) (Justice Ketchum, dissenting).

Mr. DiTrapano was in legal trouble for years because of his drug and alcohol addiction. However, he has been drug and alcohol free for over seven years and straightened up his life. In fact, he has more than met our five-factor test for rehabilitation in order to be readmitted to the practice of law. See, In Re: Smith, 214 W.Va. 83, 585 S.E.2d 602 (1980).

The hearing Panel Subcommittee of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board heard the evidence,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API