Legal Opinion · Dissent

McMillan v. Iserman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1982No. Docket 56065Published

1DissentMackenzie, J.

I respectfully dissent. The parties agree that the property at issue is covered by a restrictive covenant dating back to 1958 which, among other things, permits three-fourths of the property owners within the subdivision to amend the restrictive covenant at any time. The covenant was amended on November 3, 1980, to include the following restrictions:

"1. All of the lots of this subdivision shall be owned, described and used for strictly private residential purposes only.
"2. No lot may be used for the operation of any business, enterprise, activity or service, profit or nonprofit, where the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API