Legal Opinion
Koam Produce, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 12, 2008No. 06-4838-agPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Petitioner Koam Produce, Inc. appeals from a June 2, 2006 final order of the Judicial Officer (“JO”), acting on behalf of the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”),2 finding that the company violated § 499b(4) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930 (“PACA”), as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 499a-499s (2000), by making illegal payments to a USDA produce inspector. The JO ordered the facts and circumstances set forth in its decision and order to be published, because Koam’s PACA license had already been terminated due to its failure to pay the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Wolkenstein v. RevilleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Koam Produce, Inc. v. Dimare Homestead, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oles v. City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Torres v. City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022