Legal Opinion

State v. Ortega

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1992No. 12479PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(A)(3) (Cum.Supp. 1991), Defendant appeals raising the following issues: (1) whether the no-knock warrant was unlawful; (2) and, if unlawful, whether exigent circumstances existed at the time of execution that justified the officers’ entry; (3) whether the affidavit for the search warrant was facially insufficient; (4) whether the search warrant was overbroad or the search conducted was outside the scope of the warrant; (5) whether the trial court erred in denying…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. CordovaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WeidnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SouzaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. GuadarramaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API