Legal Opinion

State v. Ortega

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. 20493PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Chief Justice.

Reynaldo Ortega was convicted of illegal possession of heroin with intent to distribute under NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(A)(3) (Repl.Pamp.1989). Ortega appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeals raising several issues, among which was whether exigent circumstances justified an officer’s unannounced entry into Ortega’s residence to execute a search warrant. The Court of Appeals found that exigent circumstances did justify the unannounced entry but reversed the conviction and remanded for a new trial because the search warrant was overbroad. State v. Ortega,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. CordovaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. BoyseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. WeidnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API