Legal Opinion
Adames v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 27, 1989No. CV-88-0721PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIFTON, District Judge.
This action was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 by Oneida Adames, Mirsada Krlic, Nancy Farinola, and Lisa Poggi to redress alleged discrimination on the basis of race, descent, ancestry, and ethnic characteristics in the terms and conditions of their employment by the defendant, the Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd. (the “Bank”). Jurisdiction of this Court is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1343(4). Plaintiffs seek damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief including back pay.
This matter is currently before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- D'Alauro v. GC Services Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Kate Schweizer, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.