United States v. Ledbetter
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCook, Judge
As to the timeliness of the convening authority’s post-trial review, discussed in point I of the principal opinion, I agree that the Court of Military Review correctly determined “the Dunlap rule simply does not apply”1 because the accused was released from post-conviction restraint. I do not concur in the implication in footnote 5 that convening authorities in the field have tended to apply Dunlap in a way that is so alien to the spirit of the case that a more rigid rule may be required. Every flexible standard, whether it be probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, determination of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Collier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. Chavez-ReyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.