State v. Nunez
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The State introduced sufficient circumstantial evidence for the trafficking in marijuana charges to be submitted to the jury. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h), when a defendant is convicted of multiple drug trafficking offenses at the same term of court, the trial court has the discretion to run the sentences either consecutively or concurrently.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On 27 June 2006, a police drug dog alerted the Greenville Police to two suspicious packages at the United Parcel Service (UPS) hub in Greenville. A search warrant was obtained, and the packages…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. CornellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. BettisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Asare v. AsareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Harper v. Vohra Wound Physicians of NYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Harper v. Vohra Wound Physicians of NYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.