Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Hasbargen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1983No. 4—83—0382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

The decision in this case depends upon the application of then section 46(2) of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 46(2)), now section 2 — 616(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 110, par. 2 — 616(b)). This section states in part:

“The cause of action, cross demand or defense set up in any amended pleading shall not be barred by lapse of time under any statute or contract prescribing or limiting the time within which an action may be brought or right asserted, if the time prescribed or limited had not expired when the original pleading was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Graham v. General U.S. Grant Post No. 2665Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Simmons v. HendricksIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Krieger v. Village of CarpentersvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Heyen v. Sanborn Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Ferguson v. ZellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API