Legal Opinion

Whitney v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1987No. 86-0198PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray

Plaintiffs Lorraine Whitney and David Nance appeal from a trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of their amended complaint against defendant city of Chicago (the city). The facts pertinent to this appeal are undisputed.

On February 14, 1979, plaintiff Nance was driving his car in which plaintiff Whitney was a passenger. As the car approached 72nd Street on State Street, in Chicago, it was struck by a snowplow truck operated by defendant A. A. Conte, Inc. (Conte), and driven by defendant Michael Romano. The city had subcontracted the job of snowplowing to Conte. On November 21, 1979,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. City of TuscolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Frankenthal v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Dunbar v. ReiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chubb v. Amax Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Stewart v. Village of SummitIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williams v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. LaPorta v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Kennedy v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Yette v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Reese v. Village of Arlington HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API