Legal Opinion

Kiley v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 9, 1939No. 6 Div. 328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit is on a policy of life insurance.

The complaint in one count was in Code form, and not subject to demurrer.

The pleas were of the general issue and special pleas 3 to 8, inclusive.

Demurrer to plea 5 was sustained, but demurrer to the other pleas was overruled.

Plaintiff filed replications from 1 to 13, and defendant’s demurrers were sustained to replications 2 to 13, inclusive. Wherefore, plaintiff took a nonsuit, with bill of exceptions.

It has been declared by this court that the acceptance of a pay order by the defendant - on insured’s employer, if not limited in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Protective Life Ins. Co. v. SwinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. All States Life Ins. Co. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Bane v. Travelers' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Whited v. National Western Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Ison Finance Co. v. GlasgowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Homeland Insurance Co. v. Crescent Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API