Prodan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of credit card abuse under V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 32.31(b)(4). Punishment, enhanced under the provisions of V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 12.42(d), was assessed at life.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Cocke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Wilder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.