Legal Opinion

Arkansas Game Fish Com. v. Page, Treas.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1936No. 4-4341PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This suit was brought to test the validity of a certain part of áct 194 of the Acts of the General Assembly for the year, 1935, that part being a purported appropriation of money belonging to the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. The pertinent part of said act involved is § 2, which provides: “During the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, there shall be transferred from the Game Protection Fund the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) and the State Treasurer is hereby directed to effectuate such transfer, notifying the Secretary of the State Game and Fish Commission at the time the entry is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Dickinson v. ClibournSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Dickinson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Lund v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Scougale v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. State Game & Fish Commission v. HornadaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Wilson v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Wilson v. WaltherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API