Legal Opinion

American Creosote Works, Inc. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1929No. 28228PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover $2,-326.18 as the balance due for materials furnished to the N. M. George Contracting Company and used in the construction of the highway between Dubach, in Lincoln parish, and Bernice, in Union parish. The highway was constructed under two contracts between the Louisiana highway commission and the N. M. George Contracting Company, with the AStna Casualty & Surety Company signing as surety. The bonds were executed in accordance with the provisions of Act 224 of 1918. The work in which the materials were used was accepted in writing by the highway commission, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haynesville Lumber Co. v. CaseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Madison Lumber Co. v. BacheminSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Dixie Bldg. Material Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Electrical Supply Co. v. Eugene Freeman, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. American Creosote Works, Inc. v. City of NatchitochesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Calatex Oil & Gas Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. Apex Sales Company v. AbrahamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. R. B. Tyler Co. v. Merrill Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API