Legal Opinion

American Creosote Works, Inc. v. City of Natchitoches

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 27, 1935No. 33000PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Plaintiff, a materialman, brought this action against the city of Natchitoches, as owner, to hold it liable for the price of certain materials, which were sold and delivered to Royce-Kershaw, Inc., contractor, and were used by the contractor in the construction of a bridge for the city.

Exceptions of no right or cause of action were filed on the ground that plaintiff’s failure to serve a sworn statement of the account on the defendant is fatal to its right to hold the defendant liable under the express provisions of section 2 of Act No. 224 of 1918, as amended by Act No. 271…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. FergusonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Haynesville Lumber Co. v. CaseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Boylan's Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. American Creosote Works, Inc. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Shreveport Producing & Refining Corp. v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. McInnis Bros. Const.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. Fruge v. MuffolettoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  4. Wilkin v. Dev Con Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc. v. De FeliceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API