Howard v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of murdering Frederick Eugene Gooden by shooting him with a deadly weapon, namely a firearm, and the judge assessed punishment of life in prison and a $10,000 fine. We affirm.
Factual Sufficiency Review
In his first point of error, appellant challenges the factual sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he was the person who committed the murder. We follow the usual standard of review. Clewis v. State, 922 S.W.2d 126, 129 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).
When he was killed, Frederick Gooden and Jashara Holiday were living together “off and on” at Holiday’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Legate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Biagas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Horton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Potter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.