Legal Opinion

DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT/SMITH v. Neal

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 8, 1997No. 36, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the Family Court’s holding that the State Division of Child Support Enforcement Division (“Division”) is not entitled to a de novo hearing reviewing an order entered by a Family Court Master because the Division did not request a hearing within the 15 days mandated by the statute.

The Family Court Master entered an Order for child support against Appellee, Terry Neal. Mr. Neal then timely requested a de novo hearing before a Family Court judge, but the Division, which had brought the petition for support on behalf of the mother of the child, did not also request a review. On the day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Redden v. McGillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Alfieri v. MartelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. A. L. W. v. J. H. W.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clermont v. DCSE/ClermontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Vincent v. DCSE/CartwrightSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API