DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT/SMITH v. Neal
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
We affirm the Family Court’s holding that the State Division of Child Support Enforcement Division (“Division”) is not entitled to a de novo hearing reviewing an order entered by a Family Court Master because the Division did not request a hearing within the 15 days mandated by the statute.
The Family Court Master entered an Order for child support against Appellee, Terry Neal. Mr. Neal then timely requested a de novo hearing before a Family Court judge, but the Division, which had brought the petition for support on behalf of the mother of the child, did not also request a review. On the day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Redden v. McGillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Alfieri v. MartelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- A. L. W. v. J. H. W.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clermont v. DCSE/ClermontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Vincent v. DCSE/CartwrightSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015