Ingleside Mfg. Co. v. Charleston Light & Water Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Watts, J., Charleston, July, 1906. Action by Ingleside Mining and Manufacturing Co. and Woodstock Hardwood and Spool Manufacturing Co. against Charleston Light and Water Co. From order granting injunction, defendant -appeals. cite: Condemnation may be had after entry and possession: 30 Fla., 616; 8 N. Y. Sup., 151; 3 Watts & S., 460; 67 N. Y., 371; 3 N. Y. Sup., 378; 13 N. Y. Sup., 503; 9 La., 305; 100 Mo., 383; 59 Fed., 39; 9 Allen, 577; 36 L. R. A., 435; 54 L. R.…
Read the full summary
Before Watts, J., Charleston, July, 1906. Action by Ingleside Mining and Manufacturing Co. and Woodstock Hardwood and Spool Manufacturing Co. against Charleston Light and Water Co. From order granting injunction, defendant -appeals. cite: Condemnation may be had after entry and possession: 30 Fla., 616; 8 N. Y. Sup., 151; 3 Watts & S., 460; 67 N. Y., 371; 3 N. Y. Sup., 378; 13 N. Y. Sup., 503; 9 La., 305; 100 Mo., 383; 59 Fed., 39; 9 Allen, 577; 36 L. R. A., 435; 54 L. R. A., 190; 7 Ency. P. & P., 705, 709; 33 Wall, 108; 74 Mich., 466; 38 Fla., 631. cite: Statute must be strictly followed: 37…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
The Charleston Light and Water Company is a corporation organized under an act entitled “An act to incorporate the Charleston Light and Water Company,” approved February 19th, 1898 (Statutes, vol. 22, page 934), for the purpose, as expressed in said act, “of introducing a water and light supply into the city of Charleston for its public purposes.”
The act contains these provisions: “The said corporation may purchase and hold all such real and personal estate as may from time to time be required for its purposes.”
“It shall have full…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grand Rapids, Lansing & Detroit Railroad v. ChesebroMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Charleston & Western Car. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Leitzsey v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
- Tompkins v. Augusta, &c., RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Snow v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Cayce Land Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Atkinson v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- McMeekin v. Central Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.