Legal Opinion

Martin v. Cooper Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 92-CV-3343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Pretrial Scheduling Order (“Joint Motion”) so as to extend all the scheduling deadlines including trial and discovery by 60 days. For the reasons set forth below, the Joint Motion will be denied.

I. FACTS

This case involves a straightforward claim by the U.S. Department of Labor (the “Department”) pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “Act”). 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The Department alleges that defendants have failed to provide overtime pay as required by the Act, and have failed to keep employee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tarkett, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Capek v. MendelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Agostino Ferrari, S.P.A. v. AntonacciDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. HOVAGIMIAN v. HOME EXCHANGE NJ LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API