Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Franko

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 29, 1996No. 4545Published

1Opinion of the Court

ACKERMAN, J.,

After a trial by jury, a verdict was entered in favor of the defendants, *46Joseph Franko and Lehigh Concrete Pumping Service Inc., and against the plaintiff, Mark Cooper.

The jury specifically found that defendant, Joseph Franko, was not an employee of defendant, Lehigh Concrete Pumping Service Inc., at the time of the alleged negligence. Since the jury, in effect, thus found that defendant, Joseph Franko, was a fellow employee of the plaintiff, Mark Cooper, at the time of the incident, as a matter of law there could be no recovery against defendant, Joseph Franko, because the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API