Legal Opinion

In re Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Scipio Hill and his son were injured when struck by an unidentified vehicle while crossing the street. Vehicles owned by Scipio Hill and his wife were insured under separate policies issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). An endorsement to each policy provides supplementary uninsured motorist (SUM) coverage with limits of $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident. Each endorsement also includes an anti-stacking provision stating that, if the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Di Stasi v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Rifkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dudley v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Brasco v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange Los Angeles California v. Estate of Wesley KnipplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re Arbitration Between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & MalloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RaglanNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API