Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Raglan

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

L. Paul Kehoe, J.

Petitioner moves for an order permanently staying the *791respondents’ demand for arbitration of their claim for supplemental underinsured motorist (SUM) benefits provided by two separate automobile liability policies issued by petitioner to respondents, who are husband and wife. Petitioner makes this motion on two grounds: first, that respondents seek the full amount of policy proceeds contrary to the insuring contracts which require a setoff for any amount recovered from the underlying tortfeasor; and secondly, that the respondents improperly seek to stack…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Di Stasi v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API