Legal Opinion

Young v. Hill

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill for relief. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill is filed for relief, under the following circumstances. . The complainant, David S. Young, was, in April, 1877, the owner of a farmpn Morris county. He then exchanged that property with the defendant, Catharine E. Hill, for land in Morristown belonging to her, and which appears to have been heavily mortgaged, and $3,000 secured by the bond of her and her husband, and their mortgage *430upon the farm in favor of his wife. The farm was conveyed subject to a mortgage for $600 and interest then thereon. About the middle of June, 1878, it was agreed, between the complainants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Overholser v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Brannan v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1829
  3. Spaulding v. CraneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  4. Somerville v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1828

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API