Armstrong Racing Publications v. Moss
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.
In spite of the length of the trial and the avalanche of exhibits, augmented by exhaustive memoranda, the problem proposed is relatively simple. In all of these three actions two issues are presented: one of fact and one of law. To fully meet the challenge of the controversy it is necessary to decide as a fact what a “ racing tip ” is, and to determine as a matter of law the extent of the authority of the License Commissioner in regulating and supervising the character and *968kind of publications to be sold on newsstands — to be specific — his authority to promulgate the regulation which reads…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Plotnick v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Acorn Employment Service, Inc. v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Apel v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- United States v. George L. Kelly, Thomas Francis Kelly, Sr., Thomas Francis Kelly, Jr. And Louis EfkemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Dunn v. Nevada Tax CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Sunshine Book Co. v. McCaffreyNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- McMenamy v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York City Court · 1948