Legal Opinion

Hough v. Watson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millee, Judge:

This suit was instituted by plaintiff, a sub-contractor, in 1904, for the purpose of enforcing an alleged mechanic’s lien against the real estate of.the defendants Ida M. Watson and Lucy L. Watson. The bill made Creed Collins and Charles W. Sprinkle, partners as the Collins Company, and numerous other persons, firms and corporations claiming like liens parties defendant. The bill was first amended in 1907, and a second time in 1908. After the filing of the second amended bill the defendants Ida M. and Lucy L. Watson appeared and de-murrred thereto, which demurrer being…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buster v. HollandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. United States Blowpipe Co. v. SpencerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gillespie v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Mayes v. RuffnersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Central District & Printing Telegraph Co. v. Parkersburg & Ohio Valley Electric Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. American District Steam Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Conrad v. Certified Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Sauer, Inc. v. American Bituminous Power Partners, L.P.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API