Legal Opinion
Samet v. Supervisor of Assessments
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 2, 1981No. 149PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is but yet another skirmish in the never ending battle on the part of taxpayers to reduce that which they are obliged to pay for the maintenance of their government. We shall here hold that the failure of tax assessors to obey the command of the General Assembly that they physically inspect all assessable real property at least once every three years does not invalidate an assessment conceded by the taxpayers to be correct in amount.
In 1978 appellants, Walter L. Samet and Naomi F. Samet, his wife, bought a home in Baltimore City for which they paid $69,000. The Supervisor of Assessments…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Rogan v. Commrs. of Calvert CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Supervisor of Assessments v. Southgate HarborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Leonard Shores Joint Venture v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Supervisor of Assessments v. Ort Children Trust FourCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Supervisor of Assessments v. SloanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Lane v. Supervisor of Assessments of Montgomery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Supervisor of Assessments of Montgomery County v. LaneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.