Legal Opinion

Brazzel v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1971No. 654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

The question on this appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s dismissal of appellant’s cause of action predicated upon the authority and requirements of Rule 445, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. This Rule provides:

“In cases which have been reversed and remanded by a Court of Civil Appeals, if no mandate shall have been taken out and filed in the court where the cause originated within one year after the motion for rehearing is overruled or final judgment rendered, then upon the filing in the court below of a certificate of the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. StreetTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Davy Burnt Clay Ballast Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Pullman Co. v. Hays WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Murray v. BrazzelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brazzel v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tedeschi v. Driscoll, 98-0076 (1998)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API