Legal Opinion

Cogan v. Cogan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1986No. Docket 77567Published

1Opinion of the Court

149 Mich. App. 375 (1986)

385 N.W.2d 793

COGAN

v.

COGAN

Docket No. 77567.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 19, 1986.

Hyman, Gurwin, Nachman, Friedman & Winkleman, (by Edward D. Gold and Lori A. Lutz), for plaintiffs.

Rubenstein, Isaacs, Lax & Bordman, P.C. (by Steven L. Schwartz and Robert A. Kuhr), for defendant.

Before: MacKENZIE, P.J., and CYNAR and H.E. DEMING,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

Defendant, Leon Cogan, appeals by leave granted from the trial court's denial of his motion to compel discovery. The sought-after discovery consists of a court order to compel the parties to submit to an HLA blood-group…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Curry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Braxton v. LitchalkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Sahn v. BrissonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API