Legal Opinion

Doe v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center, P.C.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 30, 2025No. 8:24-cv-02368Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 24-cv-2368-ABA v. SHADY GROVE REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCE CENTER, P.C., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are patients who sought and received treatment from Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center, P.C. (“Shady Grove”), a physician practice group specializing in fertility services. Plaintiffs do not criticize the treatment they received but allege that Shady Grove incorporated “analytics and advertising tracking technology” operated by Google, Meta, and Microsoft (collectively, “Analytics…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API