Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Ridenour, Baker & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for Rehearing. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion, infra, filed on July 9, 1891.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

It was declared in the former opinion handed down, (ante, p. 707,) among other things, that—

“The assent of the beneficiary in the deed may be given any time after the deed, is executed, and, in the absence of proof to the contrary, will always be presumed. (Field v. Arrowsmith, 3 Humph. 442.) ‘It will be presumed, on the part of the beneficiaries under a deed of trust, in the absence of proof to the contrary, that each accepts the provisions made for his benefit, and such acceptance may be given at any time after the conveyance is made,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Drury v. CrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Baldwin v. Peet, Sims & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Cox v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Lampson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schram v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Clement, Bane & Co. v. HartzellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Jones v. KerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API